<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Post-War To Pre-1960 Layout Question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2007/01/post-war-to-pre-1960-layout-question.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2007/01/post-war-to-pre-1960-layout-question.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=post-war-to-pre-1960-layout-question</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Broadway Phil		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2007/01/post-war-to-pre-1960-layout-question.html#comment-22</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broadway Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2007/01/post-war-to-pre-1960-layout-question.html#comment-22</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You could halve an HO layout to get an approximation of N dimensions, but you will have to watch out for minimum radius, because N is not 50 percent of HO but 54.4 percent.  Believe me, it makes a difference!  If the HO layout has an 18-inch minimum radius, the corresponding value in N is not 9 inches but 9.75 inches.  If you happen to be running small engines and 40-50 foot cars, you can accept the tighter curves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A better rule of thumb would be to take 75 percent of the HO dimensions: a 4 x 8 foot layout thus becomes 3 x 6 feet.  You get broader curves, and once you have adjusted the track spacing you may have room for a slightly bigger yard or more industry sidings, or you can go with the higher scenery-to-track ratio.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In any event, a published track plan or project railroad should be a guideline.  You don&#039;t have to do things exactly that way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could halve an HO layout to get an approximation of N dimensions, but you will have to watch out for minimum radius, because N is not 50 percent of HO but 54.4 percent.  Believe me, it makes a difference!  If the HO layout has an 18-inch minimum radius, the corresponding value in N is not 9 inches but 9.75 inches.  If you happen to be running small engines and 40-50 foot cars, you can accept the tighter curves.</p>
<p>A better rule of thumb would be to take 75 percent of the HO dimensions: a 4 x 8 foot layout thus becomes 3 x 6 feet.  You get broader curves, and once you have adjusted the track spacing you may have room for a slightly bigger yard or more industry sidings, or you can go with the higher scenery-to-track ratio.</p>
<p>In any event, a published track plan or project railroad should be a guideline.  You don&#8217;t have to do things exactly that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
