<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Numbers on Locos And Code 100 Term?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/01/numbers-on-locos-and-code-100-term.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/01/numbers-on-locos-and-code-100-term.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=numbers-on-locos-and-code-100-term</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:04:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/01/numbers-on-locos-and-code-100-term.html#comment-111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2009/01/numbers-on-locos-and-code-100-term.html#comment-111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Code 100 rail is .100 inches high from base to running surface. Code 83 is .083 inches high.  Therefore, the difference is .017 inches.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The loco number question is more complex as there are (at least) two different schemes:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. In the US, the Whyte System counts the wheels of each axle group on the loco, e.g. a wheel arrangement of oOOOO = 2-8-0, or &quot;Consolidation&quot; type; likewise, &lt;br/&gt;ooOOOo = 4-6-2, or &quot;Pacific&quot; type.&lt;br/&gt;Other countries may use a different scheme.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. The &quot;Official&quot; number painted on each loco may depend on the parent railroad, the assigned &quot;class&quot; of locomotive and/or the order of purchase.&lt;br/&gt;For example, the Denver &amp; Rio Grande RR classified its (Narrow Gauge) Consolidations (2-8-0) as &quot;C&quot; beginning with C-16. The Mikado (2-8-2) as &quot;K&quot;, beginning with K-27 and numbered from 450.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Code 100 rail is .100 inches high from base to running surface. Code 83 is .083 inches high.  Therefore, the difference is .017 inches.</p>
<p>The loco number question is more complex as there are (at least) two different schemes:</p>
<p>1. In the US, the Whyte System counts the wheels of each axle group on the loco, e.g. a wheel arrangement of oOOOO = 2-8-0, or &#8220;Consolidation&#8221; type; likewise, <br />ooOOOo = 4-6-2, or &#8220;Pacific&#8221; type.<br />Other countries may use a different scheme.</p>
<p>2. The &#8220;Official&#8221; number painted on each loco may depend on the parent railroad, the assigned &#8220;class&#8221; of locomotive and/or the order of purchase.<br />For example, the Denver &#038; Rio Grande RR classified its (Narrow Gauge) Consolidations (2-8-0) as &#8220;C&#8221; beginning with C-16. The Mikado (2-8-2) as &#8220;K&#8221;, beginning with K-27 and numbered from 450.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
