<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: HO Couplers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/07/ho-couplers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/07/ho-couplers.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ho-couplers</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 01:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Herb Sr		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/07/ho-couplers.html#comment-372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herb Sr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 02:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2009/07/ho-couplers.html#comment-372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard, kadee couplers only, nothing can touch them for overall performance and workability.....period...Herb Sr]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, kadee couplers only, nothing can touch them for overall performance and workability&#8230;..period&#8230;Herb Sr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony P		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/07/ho-couplers.html#comment-364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2009/07/ho-couplers.html#comment-364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Richard,  I am with you. For me I prefer knuckle couplers and when ever possible I convert to them.  Just because I like the look better and they are more accurate to the real thing. But it is your RR so you do what you like best. &lt;br /&gt;Tony P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,  I am with you. For me I prefer knuckle couplers and when ever possible I convert to them.  Just because I like the look better and they are more accurate to the real thing. But it is your RR so you do what you like best. <br />Tony P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/07/ho-couplers.html#comment-363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2009/07/ho-couplers.html#comment-363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Most popular coupler is Kadee, Along with McHenry and Bachmann because they will work with Kadee couplers. You will also find out that alot of manufactures are eqipping all of their Locos and rolling stock with the magentic couplers then the old hook horn coupler.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Most popular coupler is Kadee, Along with McHenry and Bachmann because they will work with Kadee couplers. You will also find out that alot of manufactures are eqipping all of their Locos and rolling stock with the magentic couplers then the old hook horn coupler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
