<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Golf Course on Train Layout	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/12/golf-course-on-train-layout.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/12/golf-course-on-train-layout.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=golf-course-on-train-layout</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony P		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/12/golf-course-on-train-layout.html#comment-555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2009/12/golf-course-on-train-layout.html#comment-555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Harvey, I sure hope you have a LOT of room. HO is (1 : 87) scale. If I am doing the math right, 3000 yrds divided by 87 = 34.5 actual yards on your HO layout. Now if you want to down size this quite a bit, place it on the far side or back side of your layout and make it much smaller so it gives the appearance of being a golf course in the distance. This way you get what you want, at the same time you save a lot of space. Or dare I say it, build a miniature golf course. That will be a real conversation piece for all. I have seen this on displays and it really gives a nice touch. Have fun.  Tony P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Harvey, I sure hope you have a LOT of room. HO is (1 : 87) scale. If I am doing the math right, 3000 yrds divided by 87 = 34.5 actual yards on your HO layout. Now if you want to down size this quite a bit, place it on the far side or back side of your layout and make it much smaller so it gives the appearance of being a golf course in the distance. This way you get what you want, at the same time you save a lot of space. Or dare I say it, build a miniature golf course. That will be a real conversation piece for all. I have seen this on displays and it really gives a nice touch. Have fun.  Tony P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken Malgren		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2009/12/golf-course-on-train-layout.html#comment-554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Malgren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2009/12/golf-course-on-train-layout.html#comment-554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you reduced your golf course to scale, it would still require 34 1/2 linear yards! You could do it by using selective compression. Think about doing a couple holes on the layout and incorporating several more into the backdrop. Exaggerate the visual distance by making the backdrop painting get smaller as it appears to go back. &lt;br /&gt;If you were to make your course about 40 inches from tee to green on the layout you could get a pretty nice looking course.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you reduced your golf course to scale, it would still require 34 1/2 linear yards! You could do it by using selective compression. Think about doing a couple holes on the layout and incorporating several more into the backdrop. Exaggerate the visual distance by making the backdrop painting get smaller as it appears to go back. <br />If you were to make your course about 40 inches from tee to green on the layout you could get a pretty nice looking course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
