<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 22 1/2 Radius Curves and Truck Mounted Couplers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/04/22-12-radius-curves-and-truck-mounted.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/04/22-12-radius-curves-and-truck-mounted.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=22-12-radius-curves-and-truck-mounted</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 06:33:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: terri		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/04/22-12-radius-curves-and-truck-mounted.html#comment-774</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2010/04/22-12-radius-curves-and-truck-mounted-couplers.html#comment-774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ned,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I assume you are using HO equipment. If so, 22&quot; radius curves should be no problem at all with the rolling stock you&#039;re building.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actually, I think body mounted couplers on longer cars (like passenger cars) would be more apt to derail than truck mounted types simply because the coupler is in a &#039;fixed&#039; position on the body whereas a truck mounted coupler can &#039;turn&#039; with the curve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the way, truck mounted couplers are called Talgo style trucks and they aren&#039;t as bad as some would have you believe. The usual cause of derailments is poorly laid track and/or cars that are too light. Also, the derailments that do occur (and this is with all coupler types) are usually when the equipment is being run or pushed in reverse.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geof]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ned,</p>
<p>I assume you are using HO equipment. If so, 22&#8243; radius curves should be no problem at all with the rolling stock you&#8217;re building.</p>
<p>Actually, I think body mounted couplers on longer cars (like passenger cars) would be more apt to derail than truck mounted types simply because the coupler is in a &#8216;fixed&#8217; position on the body whereas a truck mounted coupler can &#8216;turn&#8217; with the curve.</p>
<p>By the way, truck mounted couplers are called Talgo style trucks and they aren&#8217;t as bad as some would have you believe. The usual cause of derailments is poorly laid track and/or cars that are too light. Also, the derailments that do occur (and this is with all coupler types) are usually when the equipment is being run or pushed in reverse.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Geof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
