<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: HO Layout	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/10/ho-layout.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/10/ho-layout.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ho-layout</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Geof		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/10/ho-layout.html#comment-904</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2010/10/ho-layout.html#comment-904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The width of your proposed layout is pretty narrow if you intend to have any half circles or ovals since they&#039;ll have to have a radius less then 18&quot; to fit the table. I&#039;m not sure if they still make 15&quot; radius sectional track but I know that 18&quot; sectional is available. An 18&quot; radius curve is fairly tight for longer equipment such as passenger cars and some long locomotives so you&#039;ll probably be restricted in what you can operate for this reason. By using flex-track you can pretty much make any radius that suits you but, as I said earlier, the tighter the curve, the less variety in equipment length/size you&#039;ll have.&lt;br /&gt;If you intend to make a &#039;point to point&#039; layout, the table width is less crucial but this type of layout doesn&#039;t allow continuous operation like a circle or loop can.&lt;br /&gt;I suggest purchasing or renting from the library one of the many HO layout books there out there to get an idea what you do in the space you&#039;ve allotted. I&#039;m sure you can find many track plans here online as well if you put something like &quot;HO layouts&quot; or &quot;HO track plans&quot; in a Google search.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Geof from the US]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>The width of your proposed layout is pretty narrow if you intend to have any half circles or ovals since they&#8217;ll have to have a radius less then 18&#8243; to fit the table. I&#8217;m not sure if they still make 15&#8243; radius sectional track but I know that 18&#8243; sectional is available. An 18&#8243; radius curve is fairly tight for longer equipment such as passenger cars and some long locomotives so you&#8217;ll probably be restricted in what you can operate for this reason. By using flex-track you can pretty much make any radius that suits you but, as I said earlier, the tighter the curve, the less variety in equipment length/size you&#8217;ll have.<br />If you intend to make a &#8216;point to point&#8217; layout, the table width is less crucial but this type of layout doesn&#8217;t allow continuous operation like a circle or loop can.<br />I suggest purchasing or renting from the library one of the many HO layout books there out there to get an idea what you do in the space you&#8217;ve allotted. I&#8217;m sure you can find many track plans here online as well if you put something like &#8220;HO layouts&#8221; or &#8220;HO track plans&#8221; in a Google search.</p>
<p>Hope this helps,</p>
<p>Geof from the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
