<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Code 83 or Code 100	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/11/code-83-or-code-100.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/11/code-83-or-code-100.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=code-83-or-code-100</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 06:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Br'er Shaygetz		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2010/11/code-83-or-code-100.html#comment-940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Br'er Shaygetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://68.171.208.138/~blogmode/2010/11/code-83-or-code-100.html#comment-940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I use Code 100 specifically because older equipment and European pieces can run on it with their deep flanges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you&#039;re going for scale appearance though, Code 83 is what you&#039;d use.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for two train ops, the easiest way would be to start with DCC.  Just look it up on the net.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Code 100 specifically because older equipment and European pieces can run on it with their deep flanges.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going for scale appearance though, Code 83 is what you&#8217;d use.</p>
<p>As for two train ops, the easiest way would be to start with DCC.  Just look it up on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
