<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are Track Brands Different?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/10/are-track-brands-different.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/10/are-track-brands-different.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=are-track-brands-different</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank B		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/10/are-track-brands-different.html#comment-16006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4172#comment-16006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[May i summarise by saying some brands are compatible, and there are rail joiners available for converting from one size rail to another.  

Some brands have sections with different geometries, such as whether three or four curves make a 90 degree turn, and some track brands have a built in roadbed which makes it higher than other simple track.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May i summarise by saying some brands are compatible, and there are rail joiners available for converting from one size rail to another.  </p>
<p>Some brands have sections with different geometries, such as whether three or four curves make a 90 degree turn, and some track brands have a built in roadbed which makes it higher than other simple track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Stokes		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/10/are-track-brands-different.html#comment-15973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 02:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4172#comment-15973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All track manufacturers do their own thing, however NRMA recommended practices and standards usually ensure that the major manufacturers tracks of a similar gauge and height will be compatible with each other.  To be otherwise would be commercial suicide. 

You can mix Peco and Hornby code 100 and you can, with a bit of tweaking, make code 100 transition to code 80, 75 or whatever.  The important measurement is track gauge, and that should always be the same regardless of manufacturer.  

Remember too that 00 gauge and HO gauge IS THE SAME - 16.5mm regardless of manufacturer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All track manufacturers do their own thing, however NRMA recommended practices and standards usually ensure that the major manufacturers tracks of a similar gauge and height will be compatible with each other.  To be otherwise would be commercial suicide. </p>
<p>You can mix Peco and Hornby code 100 and you can, with a bit of tweaking, make code 100 transition to code 80, 75 or whatever.  The important measurement is track gauge, and that should always be the same regardless of manufacturer.  </p>
<p>Remember too that 00 gauge and HO gauge IS THE SAME &#8211; 16.5mm regardless of manufacturer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Malcolm Greenhough		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/10/are-track-brands-different.html#comment-15958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm Greenhough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4172#comment-15958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe that nowadays Hornby track is compatible with Peco and Peco Setrack corresponds to Hornby&#039;s track geometry. I think that Bachmann.s is probably the same. Peco Streamline is also compatible if you use the code 100 &quot;Universal&quot; variety. Peco Streamline &quot;Finescale&quot; is code 75 which is lower in height and will only accept modern wheel standards. I think That Hornby track is steel whereas Peco&#039;s is nickel silver.
In other words you can use Hornby with Peco Universal (and Bachmann) but Peco Finescale will not join to these. Peco may have an adapter track which will join Finescale at one end and any of the others mentioned at the other end.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that nowadays Hornby track is compatible with Peco and Peco Setrack corresponds to Hornby&#8217;s track geometry. I think that Bachmann.s is probably the same. Peco Streamline is also compatible if you use the code 100 &#8220;Universal&#8221; variety. Peco Streamline &#8220;Finescale&#8221; is code 75 which is lower in height and will only accept modern wheel standards. I think That Hornby track is steel whereas Peco&#8217;s is nickel silver.<br />
In other words you can use Hornby with Peco Universal (and Bachmann) but Peco Finescale will not join to these. Peco may have an adapter track which will join Finescale at one end and any of the others mentioned at the other end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
