<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Should I Convert My Fleet to Automatic Couplers?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 01:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Newman Atkinson		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newman Atkinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16512&quot;&gt;ken&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Ken, 
   I have been converting couplers for quite a while now and really found the cars perform very well.     My 86 foot Auto Parts box cars Athearn put out had a long shank on it&#039;s coupler swivel box and if you backed them anywhere they would take your train right off the track.   The arm was tied in to the wheel trucks with a couple of plastic tangs and the arm was thin plastic.    All I did on those is cut the tangs off  and cut another cross bulkhead that I glued into place just behind the coupler box to the bottom of the floor I knotched a groove for the shank to slide in limiting the travel left and right and just loose enough to allow the shank to slide without letting it droop.    Install your KD of your choice.   Mine was the Kadee no 118  Double shelf coupler which will really stay connected.  This coupler is a good choice for long cars.   These are also suppose to be the correct coupler for modern passenger cars which use the H coupler that are suppose to be the positive lock coupler    I did this as I run a lot on older modules where the level from each module as they crossed to the next module a number 5 would walk out of the coupler because the modules have warped a bit over the years.    I am now backing 10 Auto Boxes into a switchyard no 6 switches with 8 or 10 Walthers Auto racks on the end of the train they have to push against  when backing up.    Try that without this little fix   Trailer flats I do the same.   This is where I learned a lot about the knuckle couplers and especially the Kadees.    These no 118 couplers work really well  where the McHenry coupler which was suppose to be a positive lock double shelf was only looks   they never stayed coupled over unlevel track  The shelfs never kept them locked together and of course they were also plastic and more delicate.   If you want to see the strength of the Kadee,   Their display at the MFG Shows has a clear tube of freight cars hanging many cars from their couplers from way up high.   I think with that many cars hanging on plastic couplers they would break from the weight.    Good luck on getting them over there in the UK  am sure they get you on shipping.    Good Luck with your conversions   from   Newman Atkinson]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16512">ken</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Ken,<br />
   I have been converting couplers for quite a while now and really found the cars perform very well.     My 86 foot Auto Parts box cars Athearn put out had a long shank on it&#8217;s coupler swivel box and if you backed them anywhere they would take your train right off the track.   The arm was tied in to the wheel trucks with a couple of plastic tangs and the arm was thin plastic.    All I did on those is cut the tangs off  and cut another cross bulkhead that I glued into place just behind the coupler box to the bottom of the floor I knotched a groove for the shank to slide in limiting the travel left and right and just loose enough to allow the shank to slide without letting it droop.    Install your KD of your choice.   Mine was the Kadee no 118  Double shelf coupler which will really stay connected.  This coupler is a good choice for long cars.   These are also suppose to be the correct coupler for modern passenger cars which use the H coupler that are suppose to be the positive lock coupler    I did this as I run a lot on older modules where the level from each module as they crossed to the next module a number 5 would walk out of the coupler because the modules have warped a bit over the years.    I am now backing 10 Auto Boxes into a switchyard no 6 switches with 8 or 10 Walthers Auto racks on the end of the train they have to push against  when backing up.    Try that without this little fix   Trailer flats I do the same.   This is where I learned a lot about the knuckle couplers and especially the Kadees.    These no 118 couplers work really well  where the McHenry coupler which was suppose to be a positive lock double shelf was only looks   they never stayed coupled over unlevel track  The shelfs never kept them locked together and of course they were also plastic and more delicate.   If you want to see the strength of the Kadee,   Their display at the MFG Shows has a clear tube of freight cars hanging many cars from their couplers from way up high.   I think with that many cars hanging on plastic couplers they would break from the weight.    Good luck on getting them over there in the UK  am sure they get you on shipping.    Good Luck with your conversions   from   Newman Atkinson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its great to know that others are converting couplings. I have started to convert and  gone for Kadee  couplings. But in England the are expensive. I can get the same in the USA  for half  the price. What kill it is the cost of post. The Couplings look great and work very well. these type of coupling simulate the real coupling so well. I wish the manufactures would put the sockets on the trucks as well as the train so to you do not have to cut and glue the part. Please keep the article coming the give insight into model train over the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its great to know that others are converting couplings. I have started to convert and  gone for Kadee  couplings. But in England the are expensive. I can get the same in the USA  for half  the price. What kill it is the cost of post. The Couplings look great and work very well. these type of coupling simulate the real coupling so well. I wish the manufactures would put the sockets on the trucks as well as the train so to you do not have to cut and glue the part. Please keep the article coming the give insight into model train over the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Newman Atkinson		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16484</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newman Atkinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16443&quot;&gt;Sheldon Clark&lt;/a&gt;.

Sheldon,
What ever couplers you choose to install   the effort is worth it.    Check out my Caboose Parade videos,      Almost all of the Cabooses were old horn couplers and about as many were truck mounted couplers  and one of them was my very first caboose  from 1959.            Each car you may work on might need something different to make it work or adjust the height of your new coupler.   A thin plastic shim for instance.   A lot of those cabooses I had as a kid and I basically worn them out or broke couplers without a good source of replacements or instruction at the time.    I started digging into some of my old boxes and decided into repairing the ones I had and it wasn&#039;t long before I had quite a few repaired and converted.    As you can see the Caboose Parade 2012   and caboose parade 2015 have the cabooses in working order.    That doesn&#039;t say they don&#039;t need windows, ladders, detail parts and paint.     These  trains were run on New year&#039;s Eve.   2016&#039;s run was done on someone else&#039;s layout  and I have not got it on my page yet.  The 2016 run has the highest amount of them to date and I have about 7 cabooses that still need repair or are wood kits that I have found.   As you can see the number of the cabooses on these trains is a lot and there is a lot of pull on the couplers.  So although there are a mixed set of Manufactures of couplers on this fleet   Kadee&#039;s have held up well where the others finally give out.  If you pull this caboose line up by hand you can feel the pulling power it takes to make the run.  I mostly use the ones with the KADEE couplers installed toward the front of the train to reduce the load on ones neasr the back to help the life of those plastic couplers.     New Years 2017 is quickly coming up and again I will break them out for its annual run and with a couple more on the car log.    I have also given clinics on how to convert old Athearn High cube 86 foot auto box cars.   Athearn never designed those couplers right and now with how I do it  I am now backing long trains into multi swtch switchyards and the piece of plastic is only 20 cents a car to do......     Good Luck and check out the videos    from   Newman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16443">Sheldon Clark</a>.</p>
<p>Sheldon,<br />
What ever couplers you choose to install   the effort is worth it.    Check out my Caboose Parade videos,      Almost all of the Cabooses were old horn couplers and about as many were truck mounted couplers  and one of them was my very first caboose  from 1959.            Each car you may work on might need something different to make it work or adjust the height of your new coupler.   A thin plastic shim for instance.   A lot of those cabooses I had as a kid and I basically worn them out or broke couplers without a good source of replacements or instruction at the time.    I started digging into some of my old boxes and decided into repairing the ones I had and it wasn&#8217;t long before I had quite a few repaired and converted.    As you can see the Caboose Parade 2012   and caboose parade 2015 have the cabooses in working order.    That doesn&#8217;t say they don&#8217;t need windows, ladders, detail parts and paint.     These  trains were run on New year&#8217;s Eve.   2016&#8217;s run was done on someone else&#8217;s layout  and I have not got it on my page yet.  The 2016 run has the highest amount of them to date and I have about 7 cabooses that still need repair or are wood kits that I have found.   As you can see the number of the cabooses on these trains is a lot and there is a lot of pull on the couplers.  So although there are a mixed set of Manufactures of couplers on this fleet   Kadee&#8217;s have held up well where the others finally give out.  If you pull this caboose line up by hand you can feel the pulling power it takes to make the run.  I mostly use the ones with the KADEE couplers installed toward the front of the train to reduce the load on ones neasr the back to help the life of those plastic couplers.     New Years 2017 is quickly coming up and again I will break them out for its annual run and with a couple more on the car log.    I have also given clinics on how to convert old Athearn High cube 86 foot auto box cars.   Athearn never designed those couplers right and now with how I do it  I am now backing long trains into multi swtch switchyards and the piece of plastic is only 20 cents a car to do&#8230;&#8230;     Good Luck and check out the videos    from   Newman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sheldon Clark		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 22:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I model UK N Gauge, and am hoping to convert at least some of my goods (freight) stock to Bachmann&#039;s equivalent of the Kadee coupling - which will include some of my locomotives.  When I get around to it, I shall practise on old wagons I bought cheaply, rather than risk making a hash of newer, more expensive ones.  I hope that I shall find uncoupled wagons can be propelled into position without re-coupling; if not, I shall probably revert to manual uncoupling with a bit of wire in an old ball-point pen!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I model UK N Gauge, and am hoping to convert at least some of my goods (freight) stock to Bachmann&#8217;s equivalent of the Kadee coupling &#8211; which will include some of my locomotives.  When I get around to it, I shall practise on old wagons I bought cheaply, rather than risk making a hash of newer, more expensive ones.  I hope that I shall find uncoupled wagons can be propelled into position without re-coupling; if not, I shall probably revert to manual uncoupling with a bit of wire in an old ball-point pen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R. Olivarez		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R. Olivarez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The suggestions offered here are valid ideas and worth considering.  But stop a moment and think about how large of a layout that you have or operating on.  If the layout is small, say of  a door size or smaller, it really would not be worth the change.  Reaching across a foot-and-a-half of a layout would not be too hard to do an uncoupling of cars using an uncoupling stick.  But if you have to reach farther than that, or you are disabled, or you just don&#039;t want to move from your control station seat, then I would suggest converting to auto-uncouplers.

If you do decide to convert your couplers, be perpared for the cost, the time and energy that you will need to do the conversion with.  And don&#039;t foreget about the adjustments that you will need to do to get them to work right, and the occasional adjustments when they get knocked out of alignment.

Please understand, I&#039;m not against anyone who wants to do the conversion of couplers.  I just feel that the size of the layout and the time and amount of energy needed for the conversion and up-keep should be considered as a factor in the process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The suggestions offered here are valid ideas and worth considering.  But stop a moment and think about how large of a layout that you have or operating on.  If the layout is small, say of  a door size or smaller, it really would not be worth the change.  Reaching across a foot-and-a-half of a layout would not be too hard to do an uncoupling of cars using an uncoupling stick.  But if you have to reach farther than that, or you are disabled, or you just don&#8217;t want to move from your control station seat, then I would suggest converting to auto-uncouplers.</p>
<p>If you do decide to convert your couplers, be perpared for the cost, the time and energy that you will need to do the conversion with.  And don&#8217;t foreget about the adjustments that you will need to do to get them to work right, and the occasional adjustments when they get knocked out of alignment.</p>
<p>Please understand, I&#8217;m not against anyone who wants to do the conversion of couplers.  I just feel that the size of the layout and the time and amount of energy needed for the conversion and up-keep should be considered as a factor in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16418</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Again, all these comments are right on. I can&#039;t imagine any serious modeler using Horn-Hook couplers. Kaydees in my opinion, are the way to go. The metal ones are my favorite, but they can introduce electrical problems like short-circuits between metal locomotives and cars, if they are not insulated. I run much of the older die cast equipment, with all metal wheels and trucks etc. I have to make sure of what side of the track the insulated wheels ride to prevent shorting between cars. It takes some time and practice to be able to install new couplers. All cars and Loco&#039;s are different, and you will be working with some very tiny parts, like springs that launch and disappear. The plastic knuckle couplers are easier to work with, but the springs get weak too soon, and fail to work. The permanent magnet uncouplers do work, but have to be placed right where you want them, and to me that seems to always change. Also it would be nice if the uncouplers were designed so that you don&#039;t have to modify the track to make them fit in, they stick up too high if you don&#039;t. Oh, but it gets even better... Here are the newest type of couplers on the market, and they are impressive. sergentengineering.com These aren&#039;t cheap, and for me to convert to these now, would be a major investment, but they are worth looking into.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, all these comments are right on. I can&#8217;t imagine any serious modeler using Horn-Hook couplers. Kaydees in my opinion, are the way to go. The metal ones are my favorite, but they can introduce electrical problems like short-circuits between metal locomotives and cars, if they are not insulated. I run much of the older die cast equipment, with all metal wheels and trucks etc. I have to make sure of what side of the track the insulated wheels ride to prevent shorting between cars. It takes some time and practice to be able to install new couplers. All cars and Loco&#8217;s are different, and you will be working with some very tiny parts, like springs that launch and disappear. The plastic knuckle couplers are easier to work with, but the springs get weak too soon, and fail to work. The permanent magnet uncouplers do work, but have to be placed right where you want them, and to me that seems to always change. Also it would be nice if the uncouplers were designed so that you don&#8217;t have to modify the track to make them fit in, they stick up too high if you don&#8217;t. Oh, but it gets even better&#8230; Here are the newest type of couplers on the market, and they are impressive. sergentengineering.com These aren&#8217;t cheap, and for me to convert to these now, would be a major investment, but they are worth looking into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Broad		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Broad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kadees certainly seem the way to go for modern era and USA, however they are really ugly for mid 20th century Europe.
I guess electro magnets rather than permanent magnets for uncouplers would cure the DCC chip interference if you must use DCC.
Personally I don&#039;t use automatic coupling, I do a lot of shunting UK style and it looks a lot more real if wagons are dotted around where they would be loaded rather than left at an uncoupling ramp.  You try leaving a 12 foot wheelbase flat at an end loading dock one day and three bogie vans there the next.  You can do delayed propelling uncoupling with Kadees but  not thus far automatic uncoupling between wagons when pulling. I use Peco couplings but don&#039;t have any uncouplers installed and uncouple with cocktail stickor simply lift one end of one wagon or loco    Its your choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kadees certainly seem the way to go for modern era and USA, however they are really ugly for mid 20th century Europe.<br />
I guess electro magnets rather than permanent magnets for uncouplers would cure the DCC chip interference if you must use DCC.<br />
Personally I don&#8217;t use automatic coupling, I do a lot of shunting UK style and it looks a lot more real if wagons are dotted around where they would be loaded rather than left at an uncoupling ramp.  You try leaving a 12 foot wheelbase flat at an end loading dock one day and three bogie vans there the next.  You can do delayed propelling uncoupling with Kadees but  not thus far automatic uncoupling between wagons when pulling. I use Peco couplings but don&#8217;t have any uncouplers installed and uncouple with cocktail stickor simply lift one end of one wagon or loco    Its your choice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gloria		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gloria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16387&quot;&gt;Robert Hadlow&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi,
We are using Dapol  magnetic they are automatic once a magnet is set in the track to where you want to uncouple. We have changed most of our sprung couplings on our coaches which are UK rolling stock and found no trouble with them. We are running N Gauge Graham Farish.and Dapol rolling stock including locomotives which some are easily to convert just by pulling gently on the NEM coupling and inserting the magnetic coupling on a couple of our coaches we have cut away a piece that holds the sprung coupling and glued the magnetic coupling in its place.
Hope this helps,
Gloria.(GWRGirl)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16387">Robert Hadlow</a>.</p>
<p>Hi,<br />
We are using Dapol  magnetic they are automatic once a magnet is set in the track to where you want to uncouple. We have changed most of our sprung couplings on our coaches which are UK rolling stock and found no trouble with them. We are running N Gauge Graham Farish.and Dapol rolling stock including locomotives which some are easily to convert just by pulling gently on the NEM coupling and inserting the magnetic coupling on a couple of our coaches we have cut away a piece that holds the sprung coupling and glued the magnetic coupling in its place.<br />
Hope this helps,<br />
Gloria.(GWRGirl)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JustinB		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustinB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I no longer abide X2Fs on my rollingstock - the reaction force from the pivot spring can cause derailment problems, particularly when pushing back with a lightly-loadeed wagon. But I hesitate to waste a a set of full-on Kadees on a cheap Life-Like or old Tyco. The cheap option is Bachmann E-Zmate (with 3 different lengths and offsets) combined with Kadee #212 &quot;Talgo Truck Adaptors&quot; - the abovementioned I-piece adaptor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer abide X2Fs on my rollingstock &#8211; the reaction force from the pivot spring can cause derailment problems, particularly when pushing back with a lightly-loadeed wagon. But I hesitate to waste a a set of full-on Kadees on a cheap Life-Like or old Tyco. The cheap option is Bachmann E-Zmate (with 3 different lengths and offsets) combined with Kadee #212 &#8220;Talgo Truck Adaptors&#8221; &#8211; the abovementioned I-piece adaptor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JoelDee		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoelDee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Converting to Kadee couplers are not the future, but a step up from 1950s horn couplers.
Most serious railroaders in the EU are at the least converting to full DCC operated electric
couplers on the locomotives. Yes, the Rapido Railcrew uncoupler works great on my Kadee
style magnetic couplers, but this will just extend the life of Kadees a few more years until all the 
decoder manufactures add electronic couplers and wiring to the mix. I expect Kadee already
has an electronic coupler on the shelf--what an increase in sales that will make!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Converting to Kadee couplers are not the future, but a step up from 1950s horn couplers.<br />
Most serious railroaders in the EU are at the least converting to full DCC operated electric<br />
couplers on the locomotives. Yes, the Rapido Railcrew uncoupler works great on my Kadee<br />
style magnetic couplers, but this will just extend the life of Kadees a few more years until all the<br />
decoder manufactures add electronic couplers and wiring to the mix. I expect Kadee already<br />
has an electronic coupler on the shelf&#8211;what an increase in sales that will make!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Krause		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16410</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Krause]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 06:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16410</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My experience is limited, but I found that off-set knuckle couplers are necessary to establish proper elevation converting truck mounted couplers from hook/horn couplers to knuckle couplers.  Body mounted knuckle couplers seem to perform best.  Norman Atkinson&#039;s detailed explanation, above, says it best.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience is limited, but I found that off-set knuckle couplers are necessary to establish proper elevation converting truck mounted couplers from hook/horn couplers to knuckle couplers.  Body mounted knuckle couplers seem to perform best.  Norman Atkinson&#8217;s detailed explanation, above, says it best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David A Stokes		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2016/11/should-i-convert-my-fleet-to-automatic-couplers.html#comment-16398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David A Stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4223#comment-16398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ryam,
Should you convert your fleet ?  Yes, if you want to, No if you don&#039;t want to  Confused yet?
The guys who have already commented assume you want to convert them, and have made some suggestions.  Why convert?  
Your rolling stock and locos might come from different makers, each with their own, incompatible, couplers - convert them all to the same or run similar coupled rolling stock as a block. Have two cars (top and tail) of each with one compatible coupler to the block, and one coupler to join the other cars.

Do you like shunting, well  Tension lock and NEM couplers from Europe can be cantankerous if that&#039;s your thing.  In that case, yes convert your fleet.  And as suggested above, delayed uncouplers like KDs and the clones are surely the way to go.  Whenever you buy a piece of rolling stock buy the relevant buff envelop  of KDs and convert it.

It&#039;s another new skill in the toolbox.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryam,<br />
Should you convert your fleet ?  Yes, if you want to, No if you don&#8217;t want to  Confused yet?<br />
The guys who have already commented assume you want to convert them, and have made some suggestions.  Why convert?<br />
Your rolling stock and locos might come from different makers, each with their own, incompatible, couplers &#8211; convert them all to the same or run similar coupled rolling stock as a block. Have two cars (top and tail) of each with one compatible coupler to the block, and one coupler to join the other cars.</p>
<p>Do you like shunting, well  Tension lock and NEM couplers from Europe can be cantankerous if that&#8217;s your thing.  In that case, yes convert your fleet.  And as suggested above, delayed uncouplers like KDs and the clones are surely the way to go.  Whenever you buy a piece of rolling stock buy the relevant buff envelop  of KDs and convert it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s another new skill in the toolbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
