<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Which Track To Use?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/10/which-track-to-use.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/10/which-track-to-use.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=which-track-to-use</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Donnis		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/10/which-track-to-use.html#comment-19897</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donnis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4559#comment-19897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have used Atlas code 100 for most of my trackage about 200 ft mostly flex track with 18 and 22ish radius and minimal sectional pieces.  I have also used atlas, and pico switches, 51 count at this point.  I do switching ops with some friends.
Most of the track and switches were picked up at club sales and train swap meets very cheaply compared to the cost of new in the box, of course I could  only use about 70% of what was purchased.  
All the trackage is mounted on cork beds, but I do hear from different folks, that by using high density foam for your base you don&#039;t need the beds ... users choice. 
Hope this helps and happy railroading !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Atlas code 100 for most of my trackage about 200 ft mostly flex track with 18 and 22ish radius and minimal sectional pieces.  I have also used atlas, and pico switches, 51 count at this point.  I do switching ops with some friends.<br />
Most of the track and switches were picked up at club sales and train swap meets very cheaply compared to the cost of new in the box, of course I could  only use about 70% of what was purchased.<br />
All the trackage is mounted on cork beds, but I do hear from different folks, that by using high density foam for your base you don&#8217;t need the beds &#8230; users choice.<br />
Hope this helps and happy railroading !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Barth		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/10/which-track-to-use.html#comment-19893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Barth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4559#comment-19893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have used Atlas Code 100 from the very beginning.  It&#039;s relatively inexpensive; easy to use; and a reliable track from a derailment perspective.  Purists will say it&#039;s not realistic versus Code 83, but for my purposes with a relatively large layout, it works just fine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Atlas Code 100 from the very beginning.  It&#8217;s relatively inexpensive; easy to use; and a reliable track from a derailment perspective.  Purists will say it&#8217;s not realistic versus Code 83, but for my purposes with a relatively large layout, it works just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/10/which-track-to-use.html#comment-19882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4559#comment-19882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think a lot depends on how complicated your layout is. I find that trying to cut ez-track is a real pain. And I find that I have to do a lot of cutting to fit track to my layout. My layout is small so my turns are 18 &#038; 22 inch which I find very difficult to use flex track on so I use code 100 sectional track. It&#039;s not as prototypical as code 83 but for me it&#039;s a lot easier to handle. On any straight runs I&#039;ll use flex track and cut away to get my precise measurements. I prefer Peco switches. The positive action is worth the cost difference to me. Also all of my switches are manual. I run in the steam era and operationally the train had to stop and let the switches be moved anyway so automating my switches doesn&#039;t improve operations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot depends on how complicated your layout is. I find that trying to cut ez-track is a real pain. And I find that I have to do a lot of cutting to fit track to my layout. My layout is small so my turns are 18 &amp; 22 inch which I find very difficult to use flex track on so I use code 100 sectional track. It&#8217;s not as prototypical as code 83 but for me it&#8217;s a lot easier to handle. On any straight runs I&#8217;ll use flex track and cut away to get my precise measurements. I prefer Peco switches. The positive action is worth the cost difference to me. Also all of my switches are manual. I run in the steam era and operationally the train had to stop and let the switches be moved anyway so automating my switches doesn&#8217;t improve operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chen		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/10/which-track-to-use.html#comment-19879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4559#comment-19879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have bachmann ez with nickel coding installed in most of my track (dcc).
Bachmann is easier to purchase/find, however, I found some of the turnout that Bachmann made/ built is not good, Often it caused short or not running smooth.

Not sure about kato, but price is somewhat higher, and harddrive to purchase.   I also use some atlas flex track.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have bachmann ez with nickel coding installed in most of my track (dcc).<br />
Bachmann is easier to purchase/find, however, I found some of the turnout that Bachmann made/ built is not good, Often it caused short or not running smooth.</p>
<p>Not sure about kato, but price is somewhat higher, and harddrive to purchase.   I also use some atlas flex track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
