<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Woodland Scenics Risers and Inclines &#8211; Thoughts Please	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/11/woodland-scenics-risers-and-inclines-thoughts-please.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/11/woodland-scenics-risers-and-inclines-thoughts-please.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=woodland-scenics-risers-and-inclines-thoughts-please</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/11/woodland-scenics-risers-and-inclines-thoughts-please.html#comment-20274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4600#comment-20274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am working on a 21 x 16 layout for a local museum and have been testing my maximum elevations in 0 scale. My findings ar that 2% - 2.5% offer the best feel. Yes the locos will pull up a 4% grade and as much as I desire to have that height in my mountain scene I notice 2 things. 1. It does not look very realistic and 2. with a standard transformer &quot;not hooked to DCC system yet&quot; the speed up and slow down appears awkward. I know the DCC will correct this with proper braking etc I just think 2% is a good fit for most situations however the good news is we all have a choice as to what works good for us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a 21 x 16 layout for a local museum and have been testing my maximum elevations in 0 scale. My findings ar that 2% &#8211; 2.5% offer the best feel. Yes the locos will pull up a 4% grade and as much as I desire to have that height in my mountain scene I notice 2 things. 1. It does not look very realistic and 2. with a standard transformer &#8220;not hooked to DCC system yet&#8221; the speed up and slow down appears awkward. I know the DCC will correct this with proper braking etc I just think 2% is a good fit for most situations however the good news is we all have a choice as to what works good for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Neely		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/11/woodland-scenics-risers-and-inclines-thoughts-please.html#comment-20191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Neely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 03:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4600#comment-20191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[use the riser as a guide , and lay thin strips of wood that are the right width for the road bed of your track , then fill the sides with foam to even out the hill sides . I&#039;ve used the risers on HO and when I used a 4% incline it&#039;s almost to much for the engines to pull , from talking with other modelers they&#039;ve said to stay with a 2% incline . the next layout that I&#039;m planning I&#039;m going to use 2% on the uphill and 3% on the downgrade . one of the local layouts near me went with a 4% incline in O gauge using wood panels and the bigger engines didn&#039;t have a problem pulling longer trains up the hills ,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>use the riser as a guide , and lay thin strips of wood that are the right width for the road bed of your track , then fill the sides with foam to even out the hill sides . I&#8217;ve used the risers on HO and when I used a 4% incline it&#8217;s almost to much for the engines to pull , from talking with other modelers they&#8217;ve said to stay with a 2% incline . the next layout that I&#8217;m planning I&#8217;m going to use 2% on the uphill and 3% on the downgrade . one of the local layouts near me went with a 4% incline in O gauge using wood panels and the bigger engines didn&#8217;t have a problem pulling longer trains up the hills ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles Deye		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2017/11/woodland-scenics-risers-and-inclines-thoughts-please.html#comment-20184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Deye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 01:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4600#comment-20184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On my layout I have 4 trains on different levels. What I did was for the one elevated was cut pieces of wood about 2&quot; high.Which the one layout higher then the other 3. The pieces of wood was brace by using L brackets which held them in place. The wood is more sturdier then foam. I also painted the wood a light brown color to blend in. I took the A size trestle and mount  it on the wood with screws. It works real good. Something for to think about trying?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my layout I have 4 trains on different levels. What I did was for the one elevated was cut pieces of wood about 2&#8243; high.Which the one layout higher then the other 3. The pieces of wood was brace by using L brackets which held them in place. The wood is more sturdier then foam. I also painted the wood a light brown color to blend in. I took the A size trestle and mount  it on the wood with screws. It works real good. Something for to think about trying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
