<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Will Laying Turnouts Back to Back Cause Derailments?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 03:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Romeo		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21685</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Romeo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 03:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only way to solve your troubles is to use a 89&#039; auto rack for testing your turn outs, I put two or three auto racks for testing. If useing a # 4 and a # 6 turnouts back to back you may derail you cars unless you run short freight cars. I run SD 50&#039;s and SD 60&#039;s most of the time, I have yet to have any problems MUing four or more locomotives through my turn outs, I sometime pull or push fifteen auto racks through my turnouts and no problems. Note: even if the turnouts could be tight use the auto racks, yes couplers could stress but as long they do not jump off you have solved your troubles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to solve your troubles is to use a 89&#8242; auto rack for testing your turn outs, I put two or three auto racks for testing. If useing a # 4 and a # 6 turnouts back to back you may derail you cars unless you run short freight cars. I run SD 50&#8217;s and SD 60&#8217;s most of the time, I have yet to have any problems MUing four or more locomotives through my turn outs, I sometime pull or push fifteen auto racks through my turnouts and no problems. Note: even if the turnouts could be tight use the auto racks, yes couplers could stress but as long they do not jump off you have solved your troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Morlok		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Morlok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 22:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In designing my layout I am using Atlas #6 turnouts as the minimum for my passenger line crossovers  since these give me exactly 2 inch (50 mm) c/c separation and eliminates much of the s curve problem for long cars.  The Peco ST240/241 appear to have too large an angle for this type of use with out a long straight section that will increase the c/c distance. Walthers  #6 gives about a 2.65 inch (82.5 mm) c/c.  I hope this helps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In designing my layout I am using Atlas #6 turnouts as the minimum for my passenger line crossovers  since these give me exactly 2 inch (50 mm) c/c separation and eliminates much of the s curve problem for long cars.  The Peco ST240/241 appear to have too large an angle for this type of use with out a long straight section that will increase the c/c distance. Walthers  #6 gives about a 2.65 inch (82.5 mm) c/c.  I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dale Arends		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale Arends]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Crossovers like this are generally fine. However, you specify that you want to use Peco ST240 and 241 turnouts. These are fairly tight radius turnout and with longer equipment may cause problems. I would recommend looking at longer turnouts with somewhat larger radius diverging routes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crossovers like this are generally fine. However, you specify that you want to use Peco ST240 and 241 turnouts. These are fairly tight radius turnout and with longer equipment may cause problems. I would recommend looking at longer turnouts with somewhat larger radius diverging routes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel Dee/Berlin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Dee/Berlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Depends how fast you want to go. On mainlines, we use minimum #8s, but this restricts the
speeds to 40-50 mph for passenger trains. Using custom made 10s and 12s we can do
70-100+. For the turnouts you plan to use--listen to Steve above and post a speed limit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends how fast you want to go. On mainlines, we use minimum #8s, but this restricts the<br />
speeds to 40-50 mph for passenger trains. Using custom made 10s and 12s we can do<br />
70-100+. For the turnouts you plan to use&#8211;listen to Steve above and post a speed limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 07:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A big factor that plays ino this is the train length and the weight of individual cars. Light cars will perform better when placed the back of the train.
Also ensure that the bogies are not sticking somewhere as they swivel and that the wheel flanges and widths match the particular track you are using. If you pay attention to these details there is no reason why you cannot place turnouts directly together. Real railways have tight areas too - add a speed restriction sign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big factor that plays ino this is the train length and the weight of individual cars. Light cars will perform better when placed the back of the train.<br />
Also ensure that the bogies are not sticking somewhere as they swivel and that the wheel flanges and widths match the particular track you are using. If you pay attention to these details there is no reason why you cannot place turnouts directly together. Real railways have tight areas too &#8211; add a speed restriction sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rich		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 06:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi I have 3 cross overs &#038; 3 points back to back. Some older stuff has issues I think with fat wheel flanges jumping over frogs newer 1s fine. Also adding weight helps when changing  lanes. Also nearly all my older locos had problems when I went dcc. Adding extra pick ups resolved for most. I agree a mock up test run is a good idea]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I have 3 cross overs &amp; 3 points back to back. Some older stuff has issues I think with fat wheel flanges jumping over frogs newer 1s fine. Also adding weight helps when changing  lanes. Also nearly all my older locos had problems when I went dcc. Adding extra pick ups resolved for most. I agree a mock up test run is a good idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Craig Ingham		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21653</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Ingham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 03:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The comments so far are worthy. Trackwork is critical for successful runing. Mainline higher speed requires a higher #turnout. Yards can handle #4 and 6. The success lies in alignment. Too often modelers bend the track to fit the need. That causes alignment issues. The joined rails of any connection, on radius or straight make the difference in operation. Never cheat on the track work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments so far are worthy. Trackwork is critical for successful runing. Mainline higher speed requires a higher #turnout. Yards can handle #4 and 6. The success lies in alignment. Too often modelers bend the track to fit the need. That causes alignment issues. The joined rails of any connection, on radius or straight make the difference in operation. Never cheat on the track work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 02:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi There should be no problem with having the points/turnouts so that you can go from one track to another, I use the Hornby ones and gave a 4-62 steamer go over them with out a problem. I know that peko have a slightly different footprint but you should still be able to do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi There should be no problem with having the points/turnouts so that you can go from one track to another, I use the Hornby ones and gave a 4-62 steamer go over them with out a problem. I know that peko have a slightly different footprint but you should still be able to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Stokes		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All the experts I have read suggest a short piece of straight track between turnouts, especially if they create an S curve, HOWEVER, I have seen and read about layouts designed and built by the same experts, and they don&#039;t always do as they say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the experts I have read suggest a short piece of straight track between turnouts, especially if they create an S curve, HOWEVER, I have seen and read about layouts designed and built by the same experts, and they don&#8217;t always do as they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin Ching		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Ching]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I run 2&quot; center tracks in my station and use six wheel trucks on my coaches and have no problems i also use large radius turnouts to keep the s curve as ;large as possible the smaller turnouts will cause problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run 2&#8243; center tracks in my station and use six wheel trucks on my coaches and have no problems i also use large radius turnouts to keep the s curve as ;large as possible the smaller turnouts will cause problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mike		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21641</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 01:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have three such crossovers on my N Scale layout.  Assuming you have the  corect parallel diatance fkr your scale, to keep rolling stock from hitting in the curves, you should be fine.  Jt is important to use larger numbered turnouts to reduce possible derailments.  A number 6 or 8 Peco turnout should hook up nicely, you may need a short piece of straight track to meet the distance between tracks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have three such crossovers on my N Scale layout.  Assuming you have the  corect parallel diatance fkr your scale, to keep rolling stock from hitting in the curves, you should be fine.  Jt is important to use larger numbered turnouts to reduce possible derailments.  A number 6 or 8 Peco turnout should hook up nicely, you may need a short piece of straight track to meet the distance between tracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank B		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2018/04/will-laying-turnouts-back-back-cause-derailments.html#comment-21638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 01:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=4785#comment-21638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you already have the turnouts, set up a test track on a board and run the rolling stock over the track configuration at gradually increasing speeds.   Watch carefully what the wheels do as they cross the tracks.  

This will enable you to discover and deal with any problems before installing the turnouts on your layout.   You can experimentally determine the minimum length any intermediate straight needs to be 

Also, if the carriages derail, it may be possible to modify the bogeys to increase the amount of rotation, allowing them to negotiate the S-bend successfully without the extra straight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you already have the turnouts, set up a test track on a board and run the rolling stock over the track configuration at gradually increasing speeds.   Watch carefully what the wheels do as they cross the tracks.  </p>
<p>This will enable you to discover and deal with any problems before installing the turnouts on your layout.   You can experimentally determine the minimum length any intermediate straight needs to be </p>
<p>Also, if the carriages derail, it may be possible to modify the bogeys to increase the amount of rotation, allowing them to negotiate the S-bend successfully without the extra straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
