<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Should I use Code 75 or Code 100 Rails?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=use-code-75-code-100-rails</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html#comment-30395</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5203#comment-30395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dont waste your time with either,use code 55 and go with &#039;n&#039; scale.Its much more realistic than those old fashioned codes which make the rail look WAY too big for the track. And with &#039;n&#039; you can have a real model railway without looking like a toy train set.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont waste your time with either,use code 55 and go with &#8216;n&#8217; scale.Its much more realistic than those old fashioned codes which make the rail look WAY too big for the track. And with &#8216;n&#8217; you can have a real model railway without looking like a toy train set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: W Rusty Lane		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html#comment-30270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[W Rusty Lane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5203#comment-30270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would say that use of 100 code would be more for mainline trackage and that code 83 or 75 would work better for sidings and the like.  I personally use code 100 because my layout is strictly DC and I&#039;m running older DC only locos.  If code 100 is done right it can look very good as mainline rail.  On my next layout I&#039;m planning on using code 100 for mainline operations and will use code 83 and 75 for sidings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that use of 100 code would be more for mainline trackage and that code 83 or 75 would work better for sidings and the like.  I personally use code 100 because my layout is strictly DC and I&#8217;m running older DC only locos.  If code 100 is done right it can look very good as mainline rail.  On my next layout I&#8217;m planning on using code 100 for mainline operations and will use code 83 and 75 for sidings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Morgan F Bilbo		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html#comment-29895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan F Bilbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5203#comment-29895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If y&#039;all are modelling US, then I suggest you look at the code 83. Your code 75,100 &#038; bull rail are mostly UK. I use PECO code 83 here in the US and it&#039;s great. Looks good. Code 100 is equivalent to proto code 150 and is not as common. As mentioned, code 75 requires special care. Code 83 is in between, in requiring care. I&#039;m 80 yrs old and the code 83 is OK. The choice is yours, and I do agree with &quot;yes&quot;. So you make the decision, pay your money and work with it. I do not suggest mixing, but some do and it is possible. Hope this helps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If y&#8217;all are modelling US, then I suggest you look at the code 83. Your code 75,100 &amp; bull rail are mostly UK. I use PECO code 83 here in the US and it&#8217;s great. Looks good. Code 100 is equivalent to proto code 150 and is not as common. As mentioned, code 75 requires special care. Code 83 is in between, in requiring care. I&#8217;m 80 yrs old and the code 83 is OK. The choice is yours, and I do agree with &#8220;yes&#8221;. So you make the decision, pay your money and work with it. I do not suggest mixing, but some do and it is possible. Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charlszo		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html#comment-29894</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlszo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 14:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5203#comment-29894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Code 75 requires much better tracklaying skills. Code 100 is more tolerant of poorer tracklaying. So I say, it all depends on your tracklaying skills, as well as the age of the locos/ rolling stock!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Code 75 requires much better tracklaying skills. Code 100 is more tolerant of poorer tracklaying. So I say, it all depends on your tracklaying skills, as well as the age of the locos/ rolling stock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Stokes		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/05/use-code-75-code-100-rails.html#comment-29880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 06:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5203#comment-29880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jacob,
 the answer to your question is &quot;Yes&quot;.  Depending on what your aspirations are, either will do the job.  If you have a lot of older locos and rolling stock then Code 100 might be better as the flangeways are a bit deeper.  Also, if your layout is to be moved around a lot, or &quot;played&quot; with by younger folk Code 100 is sturdier.

However, if you want to model in 00, you have modern DCC locos with sound and you want to compliment them with finer track, go right ahead.

The lovers of Code 75 believe they have the edge in the realism stakes, but Code 100 done well is brilliant.

This is one of those areas where personal preference rules the heart (and the wallet)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob,<br />
 the answer to your question is &#8220;Yes&#8221;.  Depending on what your aspirations are, either will do the job.  If you have a lot of older locos and rolling stock then Code 100 might be better as the flangeways are a bit deeper.  Also, if your layout is to be moved around a lot, or &#8220;played&#8221; with by younger folk Code 100 is sturdier.</p>
<p>However, if you want to model in 00, you have modern DCC locos with sound and you want to compliment them with finer track, go right ahead.</p>
<p>The lovers of Code 75 believe they have the edge in the realism stakes, but Code 100 done well is brilliant.</p>
<p>This is one of those areas where personal preference rules the heart (and the wallet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
