<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Changing from 18&#8243; to 22&#8243; Curves With Original Turnouts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/10/changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/10/changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: don jennings		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/10/changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts.html#comment-33014</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[don jennings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5315#comment-33014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[YES you should change the turnouts to better match the routed  (curve portion of the turnout ) to the new 22 inch curves.  That is where your trouble is coming from.
Don J USA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES you should change the turnouts to better match the routed  (curve portion of the turnout ) to the new 22 inch curves.  That is where your trouble is coming from.<br />
Don J USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: phil johnson		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/10/changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts.html#comment-32994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phil johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5315#comment-32994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did you use snap switches?  Snap switches (Atlas) diverging route is equal to a 18&quot; Rad. curve.  I would suggest either a #5 or a real #4.  The other option would be a curved 22/18&quot; switch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you use snap switches?  Snap switches (Atlas) diverging route is equal to a 18&#8243; Rad. curve.  I would suggest either a #5 or a real #4.  The other option would be a curved 22/18&#8243; switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/10/changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts.html#comment-32981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5315#comment-32981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your turnouts could be the problem. I purchased an Athearn Co-Co diesel and ran it on Hornby track and to allow it to run through the turnout I had to file a bit off each bogie to allow that little bit of extra turn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your turnouts could be the problem. I purchased an Athearn Co-Co diesel and ran it on Hornby track and to allow it to run through the turnout I had to file a bit off each bogie to allow that little bit of extra turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Morgan Bilbo		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2019/10/changing-18-22-curves-original-turnouts.html#comment-32977</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Bilbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5315#comment-32977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just some info: #6 are approx. 36&quot; radius.  Your #4&#039;s or ??? are something else. What you need to do is carefully observe the loco on the curved track of the turnout to see if that is indeed the problem. So, without actually seeing what you have, I would guess that #4&#039;s are not the problem. But I am making a simple guesstimate here, based upon some experience, but not exactly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just some info: #6 are approx. 36&#8243; radius.  Your #4&#8217;s or ??? are something else. What you need to do is carefully observe the loco on the curved track of the turnout to see if that is indeed the problem. So, without actually seeing what you have, I would guess that #4&#8217;s are not the problem. But I am making a simple guesstimate here, based upon some experience, but not exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
