<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Banking On Curve	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=banking-on-curve</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 07:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Smith		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html#comment-41052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 07:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5791#comment-41052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 10 inch radius I made from Peco Flexi-track using a homemade bender, which did the job without any problems. It was made to fit onto an old wallpaper pasting table which separates into 2 parts that I can transport 400 miles to where my grandson lives when it is finished.  
I understand about the rolling stock, I have 2 x 0-4-0 engines with short wagons and homemade coupling because the buffers lock, derailing the stock on the curve when the usual type of coupling are used. I suppose I&#039;ll have to suck it and see with various heights. 
Ta for your replies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 10 inch radius I made from Peco Flexi-track using a homemade bender, which did the job without any problems. It was made to fit onto an old wallpaper pasting table which separates into 2 parts that I can transport 400 miles to where my grandson lives when it is finished.<br />
I understand about the rolling stock, I have 2 x 0-4-0 engines with short wagons and homemade coupling because the buffers lock, derailing the stock on the curve when the usual type of coupling are used. I suppose I&#8217;ll have to suck it and see with various heights.<br />
Ta for your replies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Stokes		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html#comment-41050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 06:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5791#comment-41050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[10 inch radius - and you can get a train around it!  Wow!
Unless your layout is HOn 16 this is a very,very tight radius.  14&quot; is considered tight,18-22&quot; medium and anything over that &quot;bearable&quot;  My minimum radius is 20&quot; and I have a USRA light Pacific hates every twist and turn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 inch radius &#8211; and you can get a train around it!  Wow!<br />
Unless your layout is HOn 16 this is a very,very tight radius.  14&#8243; is considered tight,18-22&#8243; medium and anything over that &#8220;bearable&#8221;  My minimum radius is 20&#8243; and I have a USRA light Pacific hates every twist and turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nicholas Westwood		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html#comment-41047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Westwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5791#comment-41047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have super elevated my OO peco flexi- track to 1.5mm max, not prototypical -  but looks good when running locos.
 I do however agree that a 10&quot; radius is too sharp a curve for OO gauge.  Most loco manufacturers recommend a minimum &#039;2nd radius&#039; curve which equates to 438mm radius (to the centre line between rails). 438mm = approx 17 inches.
I also find that trying to bend flexi track to anything less than 21 inch radius and super elevate it is virtually impossible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have super elevated my OO peco flexi- track to 1.5mm max, not prototypical &#8211;  but looks good when running locos.<br />
 I do however agree that a 10&#8243; radius is too sharp a curve for OO gauge.  Most loco manufacturers recommend a minimum &#8216;2nd radius&#8217; curve which equates to 438mm radius (to the centre line between rails). 438mm = approx 17 inches.<br />
I also find that trying to bend flexi track to anything less than 21 inch radius and super elevate it is virtually impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Woody's Workshop		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html#comment-41038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woody's Workshop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 01:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5791#comment-41038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[10&quot; Radius is acceptable for Z &#038; T (or is it TT?) scale.
Do the math, nothing more than 4% banking which prototypical.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10&#8243; Radius is acceptable for Z &amp; T (or is it TT?) scale.<br />
Do the math, nothing more than 4% banking which prototypical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Finn Sartor		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html#comment-40830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finn Sartor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5791#comment-40830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I cannot recommend any banking curve s on any short radius due to issues with bigger engines that will derail more easy . And as Dale Arends is saying that radius is far too small for any gauge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot recommend any banking curve s on any short radius due to issues with bigger engines that will derail more easy . And as Dale Arends is saying that radius is far too small for any gauge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dale Arends		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2020/09/banking-on-curve.html#comment-40679</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale Arends]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2020 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=5791#comment-40679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[10&quot; radius? For HO or OO that&#039;s way to sharp. The recommended minimum radius is typically 15 to 18 inches. So unless you are running really short rolling stock and locos, you are unlikely to be able to have satisfactory operations.

10 inch radius is barely acceptable in N gauge, which is considerably smaller than OO.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10&#8243; radius? For HO or OO that&#8217;s way to sharp. The recommended minimum radius is typically 15 to 18 inches. So unless you are running really short rolling stock and locos, you are unlikely to be able to have satisfactory operations.</p>
<p>10 inch radius is barely acceptable in N gauge, which is considerably smaller than OO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
