Comments on: Code 100 Track Question

By: Nigel

Nigel — Wed, 08 Sep 2021 06:02:17 +0000

Code 75 track is closer to scale and so many modellers looking for higher levels of realism use it in preference to code 100. For joining code 75 to code 100, Peco produce a transition track to seamlessly deal with the differing rail heights.

As an aside, Peco code 83 has been produced for those modelling US prototypes.

By: Frank B

Frank B — Wed, 08 Sep 2021 05:03:41 +0000

The code number is the height of the actual rail in thousandths of an inch, so code 100 is 0.1 inches high.

Modern model rolling stock has more realistic wheels with smaller flanges, so it will run on lower track.
Older models with bigger flanges require higher track.

By: Ron Bannon

Ron Bannon — Wed, 08 Sep 2021 04:39:59 +0000

I’ve been modeling for many years and I have to use code 100 track and switches, because of the large flanges on my locomotives,most are older Fleischman and Roco, sometimes still a problem when the switches are crossed.

By: Dale

Dale — Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:56:55 +0000

Code 100 essentially refers to the height of the rail. Generally, it is normal to stay with the same code size throughout but it isn’t necessary. Prototype railroads often use smaller rails for sidings and maintenance tracks that get little actual traffic. (Smaller rails take less steel and are, therefore, cheaper.) The trick is to appropriately shim the smaller rail where it joins to the larger rail to ensure that the rail heads are level across the joint.

Many modellers use code 100 or code 80 (or 83) for the mainlines and go to code 70 or code 55 for tracks serving industries. One other issue is that old equipment with large “cookie-cutter” flanges may cause problems with smaller code sizes. Changing the trucks or wheelsets generally cures that problem.