<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mixing Code 80 and Code 55 Track	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track</link>
	<description>Model railroads and model trains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 19:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: gene jablonski		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html#comment-61430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gene jablonski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=6644#comment-61430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I combine Peco code 55 with Atlas code 80 with no problem since the Peco code 55 is actually code 80 embedded deeper into the ties than the Atlas code 80.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I combine Peco code 55 with Atlas code 80 with no problem since the Peco code 55 is actually code 80 embedded deeper into the ties than the Atlas code 80.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phillip Colins		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html#comment-61201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip Colins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=6644#comment-61201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you use Peco track, it shouldn&#039;t be a problem, as Pecos code 55 is actually code 80 with more sunk into the plastic sleeper base so that, above the base, it&#039;s 55. You would need to do some filing for the fish plate, and possibly shim the base of the code 55 track.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use Peco track, it shouldn&#8217;t be a problem, as Pecos code 55 is actually code 80 with more sunk into the plastic sleeper base so that, above the base, it&#8217;s 55. You would need to do some filing for the fish plate, and possibly shim the base of the code 55 track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dwight Campbell		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html#comment-61197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwight Campbell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=6644#comment-61197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am using N scale code 55 rail but had to transition to code 100 in the lead to a Walthers turntable that uses code 100 in the bridge. I used Micro Engineering transition rail joiners without any problems.Two things to note:
1. I am going from M.E. code 55 to Atlas code 100 and both have a similar rail profile so there was  no need for any touch up filing.
2. The rail joiners are plastic so they provide an insulated gap.

Justin, I think that the code change would really be visually effective.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using N scale code 55 rail but had to transition to code 100 in the lead to a Walthers turntable that uses code 100 in the bridge. I used Micro Engineering transition rail joiners without any problems.Two things to note:<br />
1. I am going from M.E. code 55 to Atlas code 100 and both have a similar rail profile so there was  no need for any touch up filing.<br />
2. The rail joiners are plastic so they provide an insulated gap.</p>
<p>Justin, I think that the code change would really be visually effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Morgan BIlbo		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html#comment-61194</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan BIlbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 01:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=6644#comment-61194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although I personally have no experience. I have seen where they take the joiner, flatten the end for under the code 55. And solder the joint. The joiner is on the code 70, but under the code 55, raising it enough to tet the top or head of the rails even. You may not need to solder on code 70 because that&#039;s just a slip on. But solder it under the code 55.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I personally have no experience. I have seen where they take the joiner, flatten the end for under the code 55. And solder the joint. The joiner is on the code 70, but under the code 55, raising it enough to tet the top or head of the rails even. You may not need to solder on code 70 because that&#8217;s just a slip on. But solder it under the code 55.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dale		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html#comment-61192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=6644#comment-61192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You could encounter problems but, if you&#039;re careful, you won&#039;t. The main issue is making sure the transitions are smooth. The code 55 rails will have to be shimmed up to match the height of the code 80 track. The easiest way, generally, is to slip thin shims between the code 55 ties and rails.

Another problem you might encounter is if any of your locos or rolling stock have large diameter flanges (cookie-cutter flanges) as these may by too large for the smaller height rails.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could encounter problems but, if you&#8217;re careful, you won&#8217;t. The main issue is making sure the transitions are smooth. The code 55 rails will have to be shimmed up to match the height of the code 80 track. The easiest way, generally, is to slip thin shims between the code 55 ties and rails.</p>
<p>Another problem you might encounter is if any of your locos or rolling stock have large diameter flanges (cookie-cutter flanges) as these may by too large for the smaller height rails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: geoff		</title>
		<link>https://blog.model-train-help.com/2023/01/mixing-code-80-and-code-55-track.html#comment-61188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.model-train-help.com/?p=6644#comment-61188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[well, there&#039;s obviously going to be a height difference when your trains transition from one code to the other, although I  gather that some if not all manufacturers have &quot;transition track&quot; to cope with this.

There&#039;s also the possibility that older stock (if you have any) will have larger wheel flanges and won&#039;t run on code 55.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, there&#8217;s obviously going to be a height difference when your trains transition from one code to the other, although I  gather that some if not all manufacturers have &#8220;transition track&#8221; to cope with this.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the possibility that older stock (if you have any) will have larger wheel flanges and won&#8217;t run on code 55.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
