Everything on model trains, model railroads, model railways, locomotives, model train layouts, scenery, wiring, DCC and more. Enjoy the world's best hobby... model railroading!
Which Track To Use?
Louis would like to hear from readers as to what type of track they personally prefer:
“Which track would you use for building my HO layout – Bachmann E-Z Track Nickel-Silver W/Gray Roadbed, or KATO Unitrack or Atlas code 83 track?”
Use the ‘COMMENTS’ link below this posting to add your thoughts.
4 Responses to Which Track To Use?
Leave a Reply
Reader Poll
Loading ...SUBMIT YOUR QUESTION
Download Your Free Catalog
Use Tiny Railroad Micro Controllers
N Scale Track Plans
Watch Video
Model Train DCC HELP
Model Train Help Ebook
NEW TO MODEL TRAINS?
FREE Tour Inside Club
Take a FREE tour inside the club.Scenery Techniques Explained
Scenery & Layout Ideas
I have bachmann ez with nickel coding installed in most of my track (dcc).
Bachmann is easier to purchase/find, however, I found some of the turnout that Bachmann made/ built is not good, Often it caused short or not running smooth.
Not sure about kato, but price is somewhat higher, and harddrive to purchase. I also use some atlas flex track.
I think a lot depends on how complicated your layout is. I find that trying to cut ez-track is a real pain. And I find that I have to do a lot of cutting to fit track to my layout. My layout is small so my turns are 18 & 22 inch which I find very difficult to use flex track on so I use code 100 sectional track. It’s not as prototypical as code 83 but for me it’s a lot easier to handle. On any straight runs I’ll use flex track and cut away to get my precise measurements. I prefer Peco switches. The positive action is worth the cost difference to me. Also all of my switches are manual. I run in the steam era and operationally the train had to stop and let the switches be moved anyway so automating my switches doesn’t improve operations.
I have used Atlas Code 100 from the very beginning. It’s relatively inexpensive; easy to use; and a reliable track from a derailment perspective. Purists will say it’s not realistic versus Code 83, but for my purposes with a relatively large layout, it works just fine.
I have used Atlas code 100 for most of my trackage about 200 ft mostly flex track with 18 and 22ish radius and minimal sectional pieces. I have also used atlas, and pico switches, 51 count at this point. I do switching ops with some friends.
Most of the track and switches were picked up at club sales and train swap meets very cheaply compared to the cost of new in the box, of course I could only use about 70% of what was purchased.
All the trackage is mounted on cork beds, but I do hear from different folks, that by using high density foam for your base you don’t need the beds … users choice.
Hope this helps and happy railroading !