Everything on model trains, model railroads, model railways, locomotives, model train layouts, scenery, wiring, DCC and more. Enjoy the world's best hobby... model railroading!

background buildings model trains

8 Reasons to Single or Double Track Your Model Railroad

double track railroadOne of the key questions asked when it comes to track planning is whether to single track or double track the line. The answer to that dilemma will become apparent when you decide the answers to these 8 questions:

1. Do you have the ability to control two main lines at once?

Running two or more trains on your own is more difficult than you might think, especially when operating a large layout. If you’re operating with DC, you’ll require two power packs, or a double power pack. DCC has made wiring and control much easier, but if you are not paying attention, the trains could derail on a curve, in a tunnel, or onto the floor.

2. Are you prepared for more track maintenance?

I am not trying to discourage you from double tracking, far from it; but it is important to be aware of the ramifications in terms of cost, space, operation, and maintenance. Do you have the time, the energy, and the patience to ensure both mains are kept clean for your trains to run smoothly?

3. Can you afford to have two mainlines?

Double tracking could double (or at least substantially increase) your costs. Apart from the increased space requirements; you will need double the amount of track and roadbed, more ballast, more rail joiners… and the costs of those things can really add up.

track clearances4. Do you have enough space to double track?

I touched on space requirements earlier, but the importance of having enough space to double track should not be overlooked. In particular, the curves need to be wide enough and spaced correctly, so that trains don’t side swipe each other and derail. As a guide, take a look at clearances from a prototypical viewpoint.

5. Do you operate enough freight traffic to justify two mains?

In the real world, single track railroads typically have a passing siding where a train can wait for another train to clear. If you’re only going to operate one train, and then maybe 10 to 15 minutes later operate the next one, then a single track is possibly all you require.

6. Is it worth having two mains if there’s minimal rail traffic?

Sometimes it is, especially from an aesthetics point of view. A model railroad can be more visually interesting, and look a little more prototypical by double tracking, or by using a combination of single track and double track. One option is to double track most of the layout and then run a single track over a bridge, through a tunnel, on a tight curve, possibly through a town, or somewhere else where it might be much easier to just have single track. That approach is not uncommon on real railroads, because it can save the railroad money without adversely affecting operational efficiency.

7. What is the length of your longest train?

If you opt to single track your layout and compensate by including passing sidings, then you’ll need to know the length of your longest train before committing. The length of the longest train will determine how long your passing siding needs to be. It should be at least the same length as your longest train.

On real railroads; sidings will generally have a slower speed limit than the main line. Trains on sidings might be restricted to 10 miles per hour. Also, it can be a good idea to position a siding close to a passenger station, rail yard or industry. An industry could operate off a siding without affecting the main line traffic operations.

Now, I could have posed this question earlier, because it is a key factor. However, I wanted to expand on the question so have left it until last.

8. Are you modeling a specific railroad with a specific time and place in mind?

This question is important because in days gone by, double track was often the norm. The same goes for specific railroads. As an example; railroads in Canada, United States and Mexico are classified based around their operating revenue.

In many instances a Class 1 railroad (the biggest) had as many as four mainline, with two in operation for passenger services, and two operating freight services. This minimized delays, because being on a different line the fast freights didn’t need to wait for the slower regular stopping passenger trains.

As a matter of interest, until January 1956 a railroad with revenues of $1 million was classified as a Class 1 railroad. Before 1956, railroads with annual revenues below $100,000 were classified as Class III railroads.

The annual revenue cutoff requirement for railroad classification has increased over the years. Class 1 railroads increased several times from $3 million to $5 million by 1965, to $10 million by 1976, to $50 million in 1978, and in 2011 to $433.2 million. The number of railroads meeting the Class 1 cutoff requirements reduced in number over the years.

Throughout the years there were also other requirements and changes that affected railroad classifications. In 1979 all terminal and switching railroads were re-designated to Class III.

Railroads with increasing revenues were often reluctant to be reclassified, because an upgrading usually meant a corresponding increase in legal and administrative costs. An example was in 1991 when the Wisconsin Central and Montana Rail Link Class II railroads requested the ICC (Interstate Commerce Commission) increase the required minimum revenue requirement from $93.5 million. This was to avoid being re-designated to Class I.

Also, the introduction of CTC (Centralized Traffic Control) changed railroad signal operations. Train crews and local signal operators were no longer responsible for routing decisions. Centralized offices for dispatcher’s were introduced to control train movements were trains moving in opposing directions on the same track use switches and sidings to pass each other.

The widespread use of automobiles, bus, air, and road freight also affected railroad operations. Many rail passenger services ceased to exist as railroads were forced to streamline or downsize operations with single track and passing sidings.

So, numerous changes have impacted rail operation over the decades. This is why, if you want to authentically replicate a real railroad, you will need to know how it operated at a particular point in time.

After giving some thought to how you answered each of the above 8 questions, the decision on whether to single or double track your layout will be an easy decision to make.

For more help with plans, diagrams, tutorials, videos etc on DCC, scenery, wiring, repairs, maintenance, overcoming problems etc watch this video…

To watch the 3 videos mentioned above CLICK HERE.

2 Responses to 8 Reasons to Single or Double Track Your Model Railroad

  • Newman Atkinson says:

    2 track system is wonderful. Depending on your space it gives you more places to go even if it is still the main line around your layout. Two track systems allow separate operation where you do not have to worry about separation from other trains. When connecting these tracks together, it gives you the opportunity to change how your train goes around the layout while on the move or get to a switching opportunity that would be on the other track. On my layout it is basically a 2 track system that can be run as a single track loop style or in a dog-bone style route (one way on one track and the other way on the other track Guest would not know it was a dogbone route as it makes several passes around the garage. By using the same system I also include a single track enroute where I must run some operations through that area just as many real proto-types do. The other reason of switching to single track for this operation is to allow less space that might cover up important areas on levels below. (my case was to eliminate one of 2 bridges needed in that area I really didn’t have room for both. Now I can hold a train for another while waiting for the track to clear. An example would be a 2 track system that runs into a tunnel but there is only room for one track through that tunnel. You know it costs more to bore 2 tunnels through tha rock.(The moffut tunnel out west is that kind of tunnel. I can also switch to the opposite track say to allow the passenger train to make the stop at a station platform or change the route up a head in my case will later be extending my layout on some modular’s that will continue on into the other bay of the garage for extra track-age when my railroad friends come over. I sure am not going to waste those presious mudular’s from when I was in a model railroad club. Yes 2 track systems are wonderful and they are even better when they work more changes in your operation so you are not getting dizzy watching them make the rounds and rounds and rounds so to speak..

  • Tom Schultz says:

    [not specifically a reply to the comment] I became very conscious of single vs double track taking the Canadian west from Toronto area to Vancouver. It is all single track with passenger traffic ranking below freight. Zoom… stop…zoom… stop. A good half the travel time was spent on sidings waiting for freight from the opposite direction to pass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Add a photo or image related to your comment (JPEG only)

SUBMIT YOUR QUESTION

scale model building stores
scale model building yard freight office
low relief yard railways
scale model building tall background

Download Your Free Catalog

wild west town model

Use Tiny Railroad Micro Controllers

scale model building house

Model Train Help Ebook

Model Railroading Blog Archive

Reader Poll

Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.